Event box

Signature Pedagogies in the Disciplines: The Studio Critique

Signature Pedagogies in the Disciplines: The Studio Critique In-Person

What does your teaching say about your discipline? What’s the teaching and learning DNA of your discipline? Come to these short, high-impact sessions where you will explore the signature pedagogies of the disciplines. Signature pedagogies are the distinctive teaching practices that shape how future professionals think, perform, and engage. How do you expect your students to think and act when they complete your course?

Each session includes a quick dive into one field’s signature pedagogy (e.g. studio critique, Socratic seminars, clinical rounds, case-based learning, lecture, to name a few), followed by a reflective prompt for participants to identify their own teaching patterns, values, and assumptions. Why should you attend?

  • Identify what’s implicit in your practice
  • Connect deep disciplinary knowledge to everyday teaching
  • Learn how other fields approach learning and what you might borrow!

Whether you teach in fine arts, business, the sciences, humanities, or helping professions, this series invites you to reflect, connect, and evolve your practice.

In this session we will look at the Studio Critique

A studio critique (often just called a crit) is a signature pedagogy in studio-based disciplines such as visual arts, design, architecture, theatre, and creative writing. It’s both a pedagogical method and a communal learning process, where students present their work-in-progress or completed projects to peers and instructors for formative feedback.

Date:
Friday, September 19, 2025
Time:
10:00am - 11:00am
Time Zone:
Mountain Time - US & Canada (change)
Location:
CTL-Kaltura
Campus:
Online
Categories:
  Active Learning & Engagement     Instructional Skills  

Registration is required. There are 10 seats available.

As Lee Shulman (2005) explained, signature pedagogies can be identified by three structures:

      • Surface: Observable teaching and learning practices (e.g., lecture, critique)
      • Deep: Epistemological underpinnings—what counts as knowledge; what's the best way to develop knowledge?
      • Implicit: Professional norms, values, and habits of mind

Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus134(3), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015

Event Organizer

Galicia Blackman

More events like this...